MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2900875169 · doi:10.1161/circ.133.suppl_1.p235

Abstract P235: Superior Mesenteric Artery Calcification is Associated with Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Systemic Calcified Atherosclerosis and Mortality in Asymptomatic Adults

2016· article· en· W2900875169 on OpenAlexaff
Timothy C. Lin, C. Michael Wright, Michael H. Criqui, Matthew Allison

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAbdominal vascular conditions and treatments
Canadian institutionsMount Allison University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAsymptomaticCardiologyAgatston scoreInternal medicineCalcificationRisk factorLogistic regressionCoronary artery diseaseCoronary artery calcium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arterial calcification is a hallmark of atherosclerosis and can be detected by computed tomography (CT). There are few epidemiological data regarding the superior mesenteric artery, the atherosclerotic occlusion of which contributes to mesenteric ischemia that may, in turn, lead to increased morbidity or mortality. This study tested the hypothesis that superior mesenteric artery calcification (SMAC) is associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors, systemic calcified atherosclerosis, and both cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. The presence and amount of arterial calcification was evaluated by CT in 4302 adults with no known CVD who were physician- or self-referred to obtain preventative health testing at a university-affiliated outpatient center. Laboratory data and medical histories were obtained concomitantly. A multiple logistic regression model was used to determine risk factor associations for SMAC presence, adjusted for calcification in five other arterial beds. In a separate logistic regression model adjusted for CVD risk factors, SMAC presence was used as a predictor for systemic calcified atherosclerosis, represented as having calcification in all five other arterial beds. Cox models, adjusted for CVD risk factors and calcification in other arterial beds, were used to examine the association of SMAC presence and amount (expressed as log[Agatston score+1]) with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. In the study sample, the average age was 56 years, 43.7% (1879 of 4302) were women, and 6.7% (290 of 4302) had SMAC. Age (OR=1.08, 95%CI [1.06 to 1.10]), male sex (OR=1.97, 95%CI [1.43 to 2.71]), dyslipidemia (OR=1.38, 95% CI [1.01 to 1.88]) and any smoking (OR=1.60, 95% CI [1.20 to 2.14]) were associated with SMAC presence. Moreover, SMAC presence was associated with higher odds for calcification in all five other arterial beds (OR=5.96, 95%CI [3.72-9.54]). Over a median follow-up time of 9.4 years, there were 234 (5.4%) deaths, 76 of which were CVD-related. SMAC presence (HR=1.57, 95%CI [0.93-2.68]) and amount (HR=1.30 per unit increase in log[Agatston score+1], 95%CI [1.00-1.68]) were each associated with a greater risk for CVD mortality. Similarly, SMAC presence (HR=1.52, 95%CI [1.10-2.12]) and amount (HR=1.25, 95%CI [1.06-1.48]) were each associated with a greater risk for all-cause mortality. In conclusion, age, male sex, dyslipidemia, and any smoking were significant risk factors for the presence of SMAC. The association of SMAC presence with greatly increased odds for calcification in all other vascular beds suggests that calcification of the superior mesenteric artery occurs with subclinical, yet widely-manifest, systemic atherosclerosis. Finally, SMAC amount was significantly associated with incident cardiovascular mortality, while both SMAC presence and amount were significantly associated with all-cause mortality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicAbdominal vascular conditions and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207