Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the wake of the 1973 military ‘pronunciamiento’, the editorial page of El Mercurio elaborates and publicizes the ideological bases of Pinochet’s dictatorship. It does not recommend the restoration of broken down institutions, but their refoundation. The refoundation sought is inspired by the economic philosophy of neoliberal thinkers like Hayek, Friedman and Becker, and at the same time adheres to the political philosophy of carlism espoused in Chile by Eyzaguirre, Lira y Guzmán. A reading of the editorials of the months following the ‘pronunciamiento’ allow one to discern how the traditional conservatism of the newspaper became radicalized by the simultaneous adoption of carlist and neoliberal political and economic ideas. Freedom and authority, specifically free economy and strong state, become the conceptual polarity that defines the ideology of El Mercurio, This study of the paper’s editorial line during the months following the coup d’état culminates with “A Total Politics”. This editorial piece recommends that prices be determined solely by the market and by consumers which requires the implementation of a total politics which is a strategy that authorities must manage with prudence. The following takes hold: “Economic freedom needs to be total politics”. One could say that this principle encapsulates the refoundational attempt to harmonize a free economy and strong state authority.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".