MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 15687: Early Repolarization and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Events in Cardiac Arrest Survivors With Preserved Ejection Fraction Registry (CASPER)

2015· article· en· W2900986487 on OpenAlexaffabout
Petsy P So, Brenda Gerull, Paul Angaran, Christian Steinberg, Adam Herman, Jean Champagne, Shubhayan Sanatani, Santabhanu Chakrabarti, Jeff S. Healey, Vijay S. Chauhan, David H. Birnie, Raymond Yee, George J. Klein, Matthew T. Bennett, Richard Leather, Michael H. Gollob, Christopher S. Simpson, Mario Talajic, Martin Gardner, Andrew D. Krahn

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityKingston General HospitalRoyal Jubilee HospitalUniversity of TorontoWestern UniversityToronto General HospitalMcMaster UniversitySt. Paul's HospitalUniversité LavalUniversity of OttawaLibin Cardiovascular Institute of AlbertaMontreal Heart InstituteUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEjection fractionImplantable cardioverter-defibrillatorCardiologyInternal medicineSudden cardiac deathHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Early repolarization (ER) has been implicated as a rare primary arrhythmic disorder, and a more common cofactor is arrhythmia risk. Our objective was to determine if ER is associated with increased implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) events in patients with unexplained cardiac arrest and their first degree relatives (FDR). Methods: The cardiac arrest survivors with preserved ejection fraction registry (CASPER) is a national registry that systematically examines unexplained cardiac arrest probands and their FDR. The presence of ER was identified in serial ECGs. ER was defined as J-point elevation ≥ 0.1 mV above the isoelectric line in ≥ 2 contiguous inferior (II, III, avF) or lateral leads (I, avL, V4-V6), excluding V1-V3. ICD event rates, including appropriate ICD shocks and anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) and mortality were assessed. Results: One hundred and seventy-nine subjects from 13 Canadian sites were studied (age 46±17 years, 89 males). Overall, 99/104 (95%) probands and 6/75 (8%) FDR received an ICD. Eighty-eight probands and 3 FDR had at least one follow-up visit. After 4 ± 2 years of follow-up, 15 probands had appropriate ICD shock (17%), 13 had ATP (15%) and 22 had either (25%). A total of 566 ECGs were analyzed for ER (3 ± 2 ECGs/subject). Twenty-nine of the 88 probands had ER (33%), and 6 had appropriate ICD shock (21%), 5 had ATP (17%) and 9 had either (31%). For those who had ER, Cox regression demonstrated trends towards a higher risk of first ICD shock or ATP (HR=1.9, 95% CI 0.76-4.73, p=0.17), first ICD shock (HR =2.1, 95% CI 0.81-5.17, p=0.13) and first ATP (HR=1.6, 95% CI 0.49-5.32, p=0.42). ATP was seen in 1 FDR and none had ICD shock. For those who had an ICD event and ER, a diagnosis was obtained in 5/9 patients: ER syndrome in 1, long QT syndrome in 3 and mitral annular ventricular tachycardia in 1. The remaining 4 had idiopathic ventricular fibrillation. One proband died after 3.2 years of follow-up with a confirmed diagnosis of sarcoidosis without ER. Conclusion: ER may be associated with a higher risk of recurrent ICD events in apparently unexplained cardiac arrest patients, especially if the underlying etiology is presumed electrical rather than structural.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.534
Threshold uncertainty score0.937

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies→French-language works237,207→