MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2900998885 · doi:10.1109/jsen.2018.2881916

Low-Cost and Desktop-Fabricated Biosensor for Rapid and Sensitive Detection of Circulating D-Dimer Biomarker

2018· article· en· W2900998885 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Shanshan Li, Yu Jiang, Shigetoshi Eda, Jie Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Sensors Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaUniversity of Tennessee
KeywordsBiosensorMaterials scienceCleanroomCapacitive sensingNanotechnologyElectrodeDetection limitPhotolithographyElectroplatingOptoelectronicsComputer scienceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Disposable point-of-care biomedical applications demand low-cost biosensing systems that can provide rapid detection with accessible fabrication requirements and user-friendly operation. Here, we present an easy-to-operate and cleanroom-free desktop-fabricated biosensor that is capable of reliable detection for human D-dimer biomarkers on-site. Interdigitated electrodes are used as the biosensor, and they are fabricated using commercial compact discs and home-made gadgets. The compact disc-based electrode arrays are patterned by wet-etching and followed by electroplating of polypyrrole (PPy). The nano-porous structures of PPy enhance the immobilization of protein probe on the electrode surface. The sensor performance is further enhanced by the ac electrokinetics (ACEK) capacitive sensing method. ACEK capacitive sensing induces ACEK effects that direct analytes toward the electrode surfaces, significantly promoting probe-target binding. Our sensor can quantitatively detect D-dimer biomarkers in 1 min with a limit of detection of 1 pg/mL. In contrast, Nyquist or Bode plots can only qualitatively distinguish positive and negative samples. Furthermore, the total cost of each test, together with the lithography material and compact disk, is only around U.S. $1, and it is acceptable to be disposable. The sensitive device yields wide-ranging and significant advantages for biomedical and lab-on-a-chip applications for undeveloped areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Sensors JournalSame topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniquesFrench-language works237,207