The Effect of Caffeine on the Neuropathological and Neurobehavioral Outcome in the Newborn Rat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Caffeine is a common medication benefitting apnea of prematurity (AOP). Despite this, controversy remains regarding its long-term effects. This study determines long-term neuropathological and neurobehavioral effects of clinically relevant caffeine doses in immature rat brains. Methods: Rat pups received subcutaneous injections of 20 mg/kg caffeine citrate on P3, and 15 mg/kg daily from P4 to P7. Control pups received identical volumes of normal saline. During P4–P21, rat pups underwent early neurobehavioral reflex testing. An object recognition test on P63 and the Morris water maze test on P160 assessed long-term neurobehavioral effects. Rats were euthanized on P4, P8, P21, and P160 and their brains were examined for indications of cell death. Volumetric measurements were taken of the hippocampus, regionally, and the cerebral cortex. Results: Fluoro-Jade B stain analysis on P4 showed significant, although transient, caffeine-induced neuronal degeneration in the nucleus accumbens, globus pallidus, substantia nigra, thalamus, hypothalamus, and the hippocampal CA 1 . Anti-NeuN immunohistochemistry on P21, but not on P160, revealed significant neuronal loss in the hippocampal CA 1, and hypothalamus in the caffeine group. Axonal formation (Anti-Neurofilament-M immunohistochemistry), and volumetric and neurobehavioral measures revealed no difference between control and caffeine groups. Conclusion: Although neuropathological differences were transiently noted, caffeine use analogous to AOP treatment had no long-lasting neuropathological or neurobehavioral effects on the newborn rat pups. These findings indicate the relative safety of caffeine in normal newborn brains. Further studies need to determine subtle changes in brain connectivity and adenosine receptor development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".