Skin ionocyte remodeling in the amphibious mangrove rivulus fish (<i>Kryptolebias marmoratus</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Amphibious fishes have evolved a variety of physiological modifications allowing them to survive in water and air. In air, the amphibious mangrove rivulus, Kryptolebias marmoratus, uses its skin as a site of ionoregulation. Skin ionocytes actively transport ions into/out of the body; however, it is unclear if there are specific morphological or functional changes occurring in skin ionocytes during air exposure. We used two microscopy techniques to describe skin ionocyte morphology and to investigate their plasticity after salinity challenges and air exposure. Immunohistochemical staining in air‐exposed fish revealed ionocytes with Na +/K + ATPase (NKA), Na +/H + exchanger (NHE3b) and cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) immunoreactivity, whereas ionocytes from aquatic fish had only NKA (freshwater) or NKA and CFTR (brackish and hypersaline water). Following salinity challenges, we noted increases in the number and area of ionocyte apical surfaces, indicating that skin ionocyte activity increased in high salinity environments compared with control conditions. Furthermore, we show increased ionocyte area during air exposure suggesting increased ionocyte activity in all salinity conditions. Using energy dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy to analyze the skin surface, we report decreases in magnesium, phosphorous, and sulfur after 7 days in air compared with fish in water, suggesting ionic movement in the skin surface during air exposure. Our study highlights morphological and functional features of skin ionocytes that are involved in ionoregulation in an air‐exposed amphibious fish.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".