MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901087670 · doi:10.1680/jenes.18.00033

Assessing recycling attitude and behaviour in Ras Al Khaimah, UAE

2018· article· en· W2901087670 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hamed Assaf, Sahar Idwan, Maissa Farhat

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Engineering and Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Education and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Centre for the Replacement Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research
KeywordsSustainabilityPositive attitudeFace (sociological concept)BusinessEconomic growthSocioeconomicsPsychologyEconomicsSociologySocial scienceSocial psychologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ras Al Khaimah (Rak) is the northernmost emirate of the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The emirate has witnessed a phenomenal economic and demographic growth. Taking a progressive stance on sustainability, the emirate has undertaken a sustainability strategy that aims at increasing its recycling rate from the current level of about 15 to 75% by 2021. The current study examines the socio-demographic (gender, age, family size, education and household income) and environmental awareness determinants of recycling attitude and behaviour in Rak. This is done through statistical analysis of results from a public survey, where 227 respondents were interviewed face to face to respond to several questions designed to get insight into the main drivers and factors influencing recycling in Rak. The results indicate that environmental awareness and education level are significantly associated with recycling behaviour in Rak at a significance level of 0·001. Environmental awareness is also associated with recycling attitude, but at a lesser significance level of 0·07. Other socio-economic and demographic factors such as gender, age, family size and income are not significantly associated with recycling attitude and behaviour. The results from the study provide valuable insight that would help policymakers design effective recycling campaign.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.156
Threshold uncertainty score0.456

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Environmental Engineering and ScienceSame topicEnvironmental Education and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207