Improved Multi-Order Distributed HOSVD with Its Incremental Computing for Smart City Services
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Smart city, a focus of many researchers from academia and industry, is a successful example of Cyber-Physical-Social Systems (CPSS). Based on the rapid and efficient processing of large-scale data, Smart city, an example of CPSS, has revolutionized the service provision model by providing proactive services for humans. However, to operationalize the services provided in smart cities, a comprehensive analysis of heterogeneous and large-scale big data is required. Further, to speed up data processing and improve the adaptability and extensibility of big data, CPSS big data processing should be realized in the form of blocks and avoid redundant computing on historical data. In this paper, as an extension of multi-order distributed and incremental High-Order Singular Value Decomposition (HOSVD) computing, Ring-based Tree algorithm and Tree-based Tree algorithm are proposed for the problems of increasing scale of processable data and computational efficiency. The experimental and simulation results demonstrate that the proposed algorithms have high performance in terms of error, improvement factor, and improvement factor ratio. At last, to demonstrate the performance of our improved algorithms, a case study about CPSS big data processing is provided.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".