Implantation of the Melody transcatheter pulmonary valve PB1016 in patients with dysfunctional right ventricular outflow tract conduits
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study describes procedural and 1-year outcomes of the 16 mm Melody PB1016 valve in patients with dysfunctional RVOT conduits. BACKGROUND: The Melody PB1016 is a standard Melody valve produced from a 16 mm bovine jugular vein and is intended for deployment up to 20 mm. METHODS: This is a prospective, non-randomized, multicenter study of the procedural and short-term outcomes of Melody PB1016 TPV replacement within dysfunctional RVOT conduits. Data from eight centers were included in the analysis. RESULTS: During the study period, 39 patients underwent attempted Melody TPVR. Of the 39 patients, 30 underwent successful Melody TPVR. The majority of patients underwent placement of one or more stents prior to TPVR. There was a significant reduction in peak conduit pressure gradient following TPVR (38 mmHg vs. 11 mmHg, P < 0.001). There were three cases of confined conduit tears successfully treated with covered stents or the valve itself. Repeat catheterization was performed in one patient for early re-obstruction that was successfully treated with balloon valvuloplasty. At recent follow-up, there were no cases of more than mild valve regurgitation and the mean pulmonary valve gradient by echocardiogram remained reduced relative to pre-TPVR implant measurements (33.5 mmHg vs. 15.2 mmHg). There were no cases of valve stent fracture or endocarditis reported at the 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis of TPVR with the PB1016 valve in RVOT conduits showed it to be safe and effective and can be performed in a wide range of conduit sizes with preserved valve function. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02347189.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".