MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901215603 · doi:10.1007/s10295-018-2097-2

Heterologous expression-facilitated natural products’ discovery in actinomycetes

2018· review· en· W2901215603 on OpenAlexafffund
Min Xu, Gerard D. Wright

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMicrobial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchBill and Melinda Gates Foundation
KeywordsHeterologous expressionHeterologousBiologyComputational biologyMicrobiologyBiochemistryRecombinant DNAGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Actinomycetes produce many of the drugs essential for human and animal health as well as crop protection. Genome sequencing projects launched over the past two decades reveal dozens of cryptic natural product biosynthetic gene clusters in each actinomycete genome that are not expressed under regular laboratory conditions. This so-called 'chemical dark matter' represents a potentially rich untapped resource for drug discovery in the genomic era. Through improved understanding of natural product biosynthetic logic coupled with the development of bioinformatic and genetic tools, we are increasingly able to access this 'dark matter' using a wide variety of strategies with downstream potential application in drug development. In this review, we discuss recent research progress in the field of cloning of natural product biosynthetic gene clusters and their heterologous expression in validating the potential of this methodology to drive next-generation drug discovery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Industrial Microbiology & BiotechnologySame topicMicrobial Natural Products and BiosynthesisFrench-language works237,207