MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901356976 · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.10.016

A Prospective Analysis of Human Leukemogenesis

2018· review· en· W2901356976 on OpenAlexafffund
Connie J. Eaves

Bibliographic record

VenueStem Cell Reports · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
FundersNational Cancer InstituteUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of ManchesterTerry Fox FoundationLeukemia and Lymphoma Society of CanadaCanadian Cancer Society Research InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCancer Research SocietyTerry Fox Research InstituteCancer Research Institute
KeywordsBiologyMyeloid leukemiaLeukemiaHaematopoiesisComputational biologyExploitMechanism (biology)CancerBioinformaticsImmunologyGeneticsStem cellComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Decades of lack of progress in treating many fatal malignancies of the blood-forming system is commanding interest in new approaches. Targeting early events in the leukemogenic process has long been recognized as likely to offer the information required for these diseases. Analysis of the representation of different mutations in the leukemic cells from individual patients offers a retrospective method to infer their sequence of acquisition and associated subclonal dynamics. An alternative, prospective approach is to exploit strategies for recreating human leukemia de novo using defined genetic methods. This concept is not new, but has been historically difficult to realize. A brief review of our experience in generating insights into the properties and regulation of primitive normal human hematopoietic cells serves as a reminder of how this has enabled our recent advances in developing this approach using both primary sources of chronic myeloid leukemic cells and normal cord blood cells as targets. Decades of lack of progress in treating many fatal malignancies of the blood-forming system is commanding interest in new approaches. Targeting early events in the leukemogenic process has long been recognized as likely to offer the information required for these diseases. Analysis of the representation of different mutations in the leukemic cells from individual patients offers a retrospective method to infer their sequence of acquisition and associated subclonal dynamics. An alternative, prospective approach is to exploit strategies for recreating human leukemia de novo using defined genetic methods. This concept is not new, but has been historically difficult to realize. A brief review of our experience in generating insights into the properties and regulation of primitive normal human hematopoietic cells serves as a reminder of how this has enabled our recent advances in developing this approach using both primary sources of chronic myeloid leukemic cells and normal cord blood cells as targets. This perspective traces some highlights from our laboratory research efforts spanning several decades that have worked toward the long-term goal of improving outcomes of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). It is also written with the purpose of formally recognizing the extraordinary insight and generosity of the Stiftelsen family and the Tobias Foundation they created. Their vision to promote hematopoietic stem cell research as a primary avenue to obtain better treatments of life-threatening blood diseases is unprecedented. Also to be recognized at the outset is the combined effort of an outstanding and dedicated team of trainees and colleagues who played a major role in the work described below. Many of the methods developed to enable primitive normal and malignant human cells to be characterized, as well as key findings thereby enabled, are due to their creativity and efforts. It is an honor and a privilege to link this jointly inspired and executed work with the Tobias Award, necessarily summarized here in very brief form.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.921
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStem Cell ReportsSame topicAcute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207