E-Amigo: Assistant for the Intellectually Disabled
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The intellectual disabled are particularly im- pacted in the area of daily living skills. They often have trouble remembering routine tasks such as making dinner or taking a bath, or infrequent events such as doctor’s appointments or sporting events. The e-Amigo seeks to alleviate this prob- lem by providing event notifications through the use of a portable digital aid. Designed to accom- modate the unique needs of an intellectually dis- abled individual, the e-Amigo incorporates a du- rable, elegant, and inconspicuous form with an easy viewing display screen. The screen displays event reminders at preset times to alert the patient of an event, accompanied by the voice of a care- giver. The portable device synchronizes with cus- tomized calendar software on the caregiver’s computer, providing the caregiver full control over his or her patient’s schedules. The initial pro- totype of the e-Amigo was implemented using a PDA and tested with professional caregivers. Fi- nally, client evaluation of the e-Amigo prototype confirmed that the device has met its initial goals of aiding intellectually disabled people in con- ducting daily living tasks. Key recommendations for future improvements are button functionality for the PDA and scheduling application for the caregivers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".