Treatment of recurrent or persistent spontaneous pneumothorax in children with synthetic glue pleurodesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background/purpose: The optimal treatment of recurrent pneumothorax or persistent air leak after standard surgical treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax in children is poorly defined. This study reports a preliminary experience with synthetic glue pleurodesis as definitive treatment for recurrent or refractory spontaneous pneumothorax (RPSP) in children. Methods: A retrospective review of two cases of RPSP in children treated with synthetic glue using an image-guided interventional delivery system was performed. Results: Two males (ages 13 and 16) with twice recurrent SP after video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) were reviewed. Both patients were treated with a radiologically-guided catheter application of synthetic glue to the presumed site of air-leak on the visceral pleural surface of the lung. Pneumothoraces resolved within 24 hours in both patients, and there have been no recurrences at a median of 12 months follow-up. Conclusions: Synthetic glue pleurodesis shows early therapeutic promise for RPSP in children, as a salvage therapy after previous VATS. Keywords: Pediatric, Spontaneous pneumothorax, Recurrent, Refractory, Glue, Pleurodesis
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".