Alcyonacea awakens: Palaeobiology and palaeoecology of Palaeozoic octocorals known from their sclerites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most Alcyonacea (subclass Octocorallia) have skeletons made up of small calcareous pieces called sclerites that are difficult to both preserve and recognize, which explains the scarce and irregular fossil record of the group. In this work, we study 56 geological samples bearing Syringoalcyon, a genus constituted by Alcyonacea represented by sclerites encrusting the outer walls and stolons of a syringoporoid coral. These samples come from 18 Silurian to mostly Carboniferous localities in Canada, USA, Mexico, Morocco, Algeria, Spain, Iran, and China. A morphological and numerical study was carried out to determine the main morphological and palaeobiological features of the sclerites and the Alcyonacea itself and to establish a new genus for these sclerites. The study facilitated distinguishing four sclerite morphotypes (spindle, elongate spindle, club, and arrowhead). Live sclerites can be attached through biotic or abiotic linkages to biotic substrate patches by insertion or cementation. Spindle sclerites arranged in vertical fences are the most common model, but other arrangements such as stacking or short horizontal fences have been observed even in a single specimen. The morphotypes, dimensions of the sclerites, substrates, and types of arrangement observed are well known in Recent Alcyonacea. According to the arrangements of the sclerites, the alcyonacean morphology was different depending on the shape and dimensions of the substrate. This Syringoporidae–Alcyonacea association is a good example of ecological engineering, but several data suggest that the relationship between these two corals was closer than hard substrate colonization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".