All-fiber passively Q-switched erbium fiber laser implementing erbium-ytterbium-thulium co-doped saturable absorber fiber
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We demonstrate a passive Q-switched fiber laser using an erbium-ytterbium-thulium (Er-Yb-Tm) doped fiber. The length of the Er-Yb-Tm co-doped fiber is varied from 0.4 m to 1.4 m to study the effect of this passive gain medium for pulse laser performance. The proposed laser operates in the pulse operation regime within a certain range of pump powers, which is dependent on the length of the Er-Yb-Tm co-doped fiber. A longer fiber employed in the laser cavity results in a higher laser pump power threshold, but a wider pump power range of pulse laser operation. The experimental outcome shows that a 1.0 m Er-Yb-Tm co-doped fiber offers the best performance in this work with a Q-switched pump power threshold of 45.1 mW, the widest pulse energy output range of 0.0439 μ J from 0.0167 μ J to 0.0606 μ J, with the supplementary advantage of 120.7 mW Q-switched laser operating range. This fiber gain medium analysis contributes to the generation of short pulse laser source without employing any chemical materials and complex laser setup.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".