MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901636177 · doi:10.1111/geb.12827

Testing multiple hypotheses for the high endemic plant diversity of the Tibetan Plateau

2018· article· en· W2901636177 on OpenAlexafffund
Haibin Yu, David C. Deane, Xinghua Sui, Suqin Fang, Chengjin Chu, Yu Liu, Fangliang He

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Ecology and Biogeography · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPlateau (mathematics)EcologySpecies richnessGeographyEndemismClimate changeBiogeographyBiodiversityPhylogenetic diversityPhylogenetic treeBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Aim The Tibetan Plateau harbours the highest alpine and endemic plant diversity in the world, attributed to rapid diversification during the plateau uplift and Quaternary climate fluctuations. However, there is little understanding of which hypotheses associated with these geological and climatic processes garner strong support as explanations for the observed diversity patterns. Here, we test support for hypotheses related to uplift and climate changes that could account for the high endemicity and phylogenetic diversity of the world’s highest plateau. Location Tibetan Plateau (TP). Time period Neogene, Quaternary and current period. Major taxa studied Tibetan endemic seed plants. Methods We collated data on endemic seed‐plant distribution based on county‐level mapping from published monographs and online databases. We calculated species richness (SR) and phylogenetic diversity for endemic herbs, shrubs, trees, and all plants for 0.5‐degree × 0.5‐degree grid cells covering the TP. We derived environmental and evolutionary predictors to evaluate eight biogeographical hypotheses associated with plateau uplift and climate fluctuations, and used partial regression analysis and mixed conditional autoregressive (CAR) models to assess the relative contribution of each predictor to the extant diversity of the TP. Results We found plateau uplift independently explained more variance in diversity than climate fluctuations, but there were also strong interaction effects. The full CAR models including all predictors explained 37%–75% of the total variation across diversity measures and life forms. The predictor representing the montane museum hypothesis explained the most variation ( c . 25%), but each predictor explained at least 6%. Main conclusions These results demonstrate that both the plateau uplift and Quaternary climate fluctuations had large impacts on current patterns of species diversity, but the influence of plateau uplift was more pronounced than that of climate changes. Our study suggests that plateau uplift and climate changes are the original drivers of complex biogeographical processes accounting for the biodiversity of the TP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.871

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations77
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Ecology and BiogeographySame topicEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesFrench-language works237,207