MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901670379 · doi:10.14740/wjon1138w

Role of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DWMRI) in Assessment of Primary Penile Tumor Characteristics and Its Correlations With Inguinal Lymph Node Metastasis: A Prospective Study

2018· article· en· W2901670379 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sasanka Kumar Barua, Pranab K. Kaman, Saumar Jyoti Baruah, Rajeev T.P., Puskal Kumar Bagchi, Debanga Sarma, Yashasvi Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Oncology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenital Health and Disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePenile cancerMagnetic resonance imagingMalignancyLymph nodeMetastasisRadiologyPelvisInguinal lymphadenopathyPenisDiffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance ImagingPenile CarcinomaEffective diffusion coefficientLymphDissection (medical)Nuclear medicineCancerPathologySurgeryBiopsyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Penile cancer is a rare malignancy. The extent of lymph node (LN) metastasis is the most important prognostic factor in penile cancer. However, preoperative prediction of LN involvement in clinically non-palpable LN is still a challenge. In absence of a reliable biomarker, attempts are being made to validate imaging characteristics as a predictive tool. The aim of the present study is to assess the primary penile tumor characteristics with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWMRI) and its correlations with inguinal LN status and tumor positivity in LN dissection specimen within normal sized LNs. Methods: Twenty-six patients with carcinoma penis underwent DWMRI of penis and pelvis. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of primary tumor were compared with histological characteristics. Inclusion criteria encompassed all cases of clinically non-palpable inguinal LN and normal sized LN on imaging. All palpable inguinal nodes with pelvic lymphadenopathies were excluded from this study. Results: The primary tumor ADC ranged from 0.65 × 10 -3 - 1.2 × 10 -3 mm 2 /s (mean: 0.87 × 10 -3 ± 0.11 × 10 -3 mm 2 /s). In pT1 and pT3 tumors, mean ADC values were 0.86 × 10 -3 ± 0.10 × 10 -3 and 0.81 × 10 3 ± 0.09 × 10 3 mm 2 /s, respectively. The mean ADC values for grade 1, grade 2 and grade 3 were 0.89 × 10 -3 , 0.82 × 10 -3 and 0.80 × 10 -3 mm 2 /s, respectively. The ADC value of < 0.95 × 10 -3 mm 2 /s was positively correlated with pathological LN presence within normal sized LN. With mean ADC value of 0.87 × 10 -3 ± 0.11 × 10 -3 mm 2 /s, sensitivity and positive predictive values for primary penile cancer were 100% and 84.61%, respectively. The mean ADC value for higher-grade and -stage tumor was low. The sensitivity and specificity of predicting LN metastasis by DWMRI were 87.22% and 80.90%, respectively. Conclusion: ADC value of primary tumor can help in prediction of LN metastasis in carcinoma penis with clinically and radiologically normal groin. World J Oncol. 2018;9(5-6):145-150 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/wjon1138w Â

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.341

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of OncologySame topicGenital Health and DiseaseFrench-language works237,207