Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this collection is to investigate the dialectical relation between the subject's subjectivity and the object identity from both an epistemological and a political standpoint. By confronting the object identity with the researchers' subjectivity, the authors embrace an introspection, both epistemological and self-reflexive, about their diciplinary praxis so as to find out and possibly question the personal material — be it racial, gender-related, sexual, or cultural — that the practioners of their discipline or themselves may project onto the object of their analysis. The collection unfolds through the following stages. The first part deals with the hierarchy of identities and their systematized interaction for securing domination. The second part examines the different epistemological caesurae which are supposed to discard political domination but which could very well reveal themselves as theoretical and discursive weapons revived for the sake of power. Is the creation of new identities by crossing national cultures and thus unbinding individualities a plausible way out? How can the complexity of identities be reappraised through geographical and disciplinary cross-perspectives? This is the theme of the third part, while the fourth and last examines concurrently how subjective and artistic strategies — such as black queer subjectivity — can dismantle reductive theoretical systems and their political facets. Contributors: Rozena Maart (The Biko Institute, Canada) ; Monica Michlin (Universite Paris IV-Sorbonne) ; Sabine Broeck (University of Bremen, Germany) ; Michelle M. Wright (University of Minnesota, USA) ; Guillaume Marche (Universite Paris 12-Val-de-Marne) ; Roderick A. Ferguson (University of Minnesota, USA) ; Corey D. B. Walker (Brown University, USA) ; Peggy Pacini (Universite Paris IV-Sorbonne) ; Lawrence P. Jackson (Emory University, USA) ; Xavier Lemoine (Universite de Nantes) ; Nick Rees-Roberts (Universite Paris III-Sorbonne Nouvelle) ; Jean-Paul Rocchi (Universite Paris-Diderot).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".