Bibliographic record
Abstract
PASCAL CORDEREIX, LUC VERRIER Durant l'enquête menée dans les Ardennes franco-belges en juin-juillet 1912, Ferdinand Brunot et les Archives de la parole utilisent, pour collecter les parlers régionaux, un appareil d'enregistrement peu habituel, un phonographe dérivé du ronéophone Pathé, un choix qui cache des enjeux industriels et scientifiques… La collecte des « patois », dialectes et parlers régionaux occupe une place centrale dans le dispositif des Archives de la parole que Ferdinand Brunot crée le 3 juin 1911 à la Sorbonne, avec l'aide de l'industriel Émile Pathé 1 .À travers un projet d'« exploration dialectale de la France », l'objectif de Brunot est de réaliser un « atlas phonographique » linguistique des parlers de France.Cet atlas connaît un début de 1 Fumay, dans la vallée de la Meuse, vers 1910, carte postale BNF, Estampes et Photographie, Va MAT 08b CP 268 2 Une promenade en Belgique : patois de Fumay, Paris, Archives de la parole, 1912, disque Pathé 90 t, 25 cm (détail) BNF, Audiovisuel, AP 168 Ci-contre Ci-dessus Bibliothèque nationale de France
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".