MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901773446 · doi:10.3389/fneur.2018.00909

Association Between Serum Vitamin D Levels and Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2018· review· en· W2901773446 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xiaoyue Luo, Ruwei Ou, Rajib Dutta, Yuan Tian, Hai Xiong, Huifang Shang

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Neurology · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVitamin D Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeta-analysisInternal medicineMedicineVitamin D and neurologyCochrane LibraryParkinson's diseaseObservational studyGastroenterologyvitamin D deficiencyRating scaleDiseasePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Vitamin D is an important secosteroid which is involved the development and regulation of brain activity. Several studies have focused on exploring the relationship between serum vitamin D levels and Parkinson’s disease (PD), but the conclusion remains ambiguous. Methods: We searched observational studies that explored the association between serum vitamin D levels and PD based on PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library from inception through to December 2017. The quality of included studies was evaluated by using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale(NOS). Statistical analysis of this meta-analysis was performed by Stata version 12.0 and R software. Results: Twenty-one studies with a total of 3052 PD patients and 3536 controls were included. Compared with controls, PD patients had lower serum vitamin D levels (WMD -5.21, 95%CI -6.48, -3.94), especially in higher latitude regions (WMD -5.53, 95%CI -7.49, -3.57). Assay methods contributed significantly to high heterogeneity. Furthermore, PD patients with deficient vitamin D levels had advanced risk (OR 2.08, 95%CI 1.35, 3.19) than those patients with insufficient ones (OR=1.73, 95%CI 1.48, 2.03). In addition, serum vitamin D levels were also related to the severity of PD (WMD-6.31, 95%CI -9.13, -3.50) and the summary correlation coefficient showed strongly negative correlation (r=-0.61, 95%CI -0.76, -0.39). Moreover, the pooled correlation coefficient revealed that serum vitamin D levels were also negatively correlated to the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale III (UPDRS III) (r=-0.36, 95%CI -0.53, -0.16), but did not correlate with the duration of PD (P=0.37) and age of patients (P=0.49). Conclusion: Serum vitamin D levels are inversely associated with the risk and severity of PD. Our results provided an updated evidence of association between low vitamin D levels and PD and prompt the adjunctive therapeutic decisions about vitamin D replacement in PD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0160.034
Bibliometrics0.0060.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations72
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in NeurologySame topicVitamin D Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207