MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901801252 · doi:10.1149/ma2018-02/56/2001

(Invited) Design of Nanomaterial-Based Electrochemical Sensor for Sensitive Detection of Nitric Oxide

2018· article· en· W2901801252 on OpenAlexaff
Aicheng Chen, Zhonggang Liu, Neelam Khaper

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrochemical sensors and biosensors
Canadian institutionsNOSM UniversityUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanoporousBimetallic stripElectrochemical gas sensorMaterials scienceAmperometryElectrochemistryGrapheneNanocompositeNanomaterialsElectrodeMicroelectrodeDifferential pulse voltammetryCyclic voltammetryNanoparticleOxideDetection limitNanotechnologyChemical engineeringChemistryChromatographyMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nitric oxide (NO) plays important roles in myriad biological processes and is considered as a biomarker of cardiovascular disease, hypertension, symptoms of vaginitis, and cancer. Sensitive detection of NO molecules is vital toward the understanding of cell functionality and pathology as well as to the diagnosis of disease, drug discovery, and biological research [1-4]. Here, we report on the development of high-performance NO electrochemical sensors based on the nanocomposite of reduced graphene oxide (rGO) and AuPt bimetallic nanoparticles (rGO-AuPt) and the nanoporous Au microelectrode. The rGO-AuPt nanocomposites were formed a glassy carbon electrode (GCE) using an electrochemical method. The prepared nanocomposites were tested for the electrochemical detection of NO using differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) and amperometric methods. The dependence of AuPt molar ratios on the electrochemical performance was investigated. Through the combination of the advantages of the high conductivity from rGO and highly electrocatalytic activity from AuPt bimetallic nanoparticles, the rGO-AuPt based NO sensor exhibited a high sensitivity of 7.35 µA µM-1 and a low detection limit of 2.88 nM. Additionally, negligible interference from common ions or organic molecules was observed, and the r-GO-AuPt modified electrode demonstrated excellent stability. Moreover, this optimized electrochemical sensor was practicable for efficiently monitoring the NO released from rat cardiac cells, which were stimulated by L-arginine (L-arg), showing that stressed cells generated over 10 times more NO than normal cells. The nanoporous gold microelectrode was fabricated via an electrochemical alloying/dealloying method. It exhibited a high electrochemically active surface area and excellent performance for the detection of NO with high stability. Based on DPV and amperometric techniques, extremely high sensitivities (21.9 μA μM-1 cm-2 and 14.3 μA μM-1 cm-2) with very low detection limits of 17.0 nM and 1.43 nM, respectively, have been achieved. Moreover, the developed nanoporous Au microelectrode provides a new approach to monitor NO release from different cells, revealing that a significant differential amount of NO can be generated from the normal and stressed rat cardiac cells as well as from the untreated and treated breast cancer cells, promising for the elucidation of cellular stress responses and medical diagnostics. References [1] Z.G. Liu, H. Forsyth, N.Khaper, A. Chen. Analyst 141 (2016) 4074-4083. [2] M. Govindhan, A. Chen. Microchim. Acta 183 (2016) 2879-2887 [3] M. Govindhan, Z. Liu, A. Chen. Nanomater. 6 (2016) 211. [4] Z Liu, A Nemec-Bakk, N Khaper, A Chen. Anal. Chem. 89 (2017) 8036-8043

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicElectrochemical sensors and biosensorsFrench-language works237,207