Efficacy of ESHAP Regimen in Transplant Ineligible Patients With Relapsed/Refractory T-Cell Lymphoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Salvage chemotherapy is the mainstay for the treatment of relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphomas (R/R PTCLs). ESHAP regimen, consisting of etoposide, methylprednisolone, high-dose Ara-C, and cisplatin is considered one of the well-accepted regimens for R/R lymphoma. Though, the evidence of long-term efficacy of ESHAP on R/R PTCLs is limited. This study aims to determine the efficacy and safety of ESHAP as a first salvage regimen, not followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), in R/R PTCLs. METHODS: Patients with PTCLs, who progressed after one prior therapy and received ESHAP as a salvage treatment without subsequent ASCT, were recruited from the prospective observational study in the patients with lymphoma. RESULTS: From January 2005 to April 2015, 33 patients with R/R PTCLs received ESHAP as first salvage regimen at Chiang Mai University Hospital. The overall response rate was 46% (complete remission (CR) 39%). The median duration of response was 18 months. Median second progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 8.0 and 11.0 months, respectively. Patients having late relapse had more favorable OS than those having early relapsed or refractory disease with a median OS of 21, 17 and 3 months, respectively (P = 0.001). Patients achieving CR after ESHAP had significantly better median OS (39, 7 and 5 months, P < 0.0001) and second PFS (33, 2 and 2 months, P < 0.0001) than those achieving PR or having progressive disease. Grade 3-4 neutropenia (45.5%) and thrombocytopenia (33.4%) were common but manageable. CONCLUSIONS: ESHAP offers a long-term survival in some transplant ineligible patients with PTCLs who were chemosensitive with late relapse after front-line therapy. These results require further investigation in a prospective study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".