MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901887197 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofy210.2136

2483. Twelve-Month Immunogenicity and Safety of an Adjuvanted Recombinant Zoster Vaccine in Immunosuppressed Adults Post Renal Transplant: a Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial

2018· article· en· W2901887197 on OpenAlexaff
Peter Vink, Josep Ramón, Ana Sánchez‐Fructuoso, Sung-Joo Kim, Sang-Il Kim, Jeffrey S. Zaltzman, Fernanda Ortiz, Josep Maria Campistol Plana, Ana María Fernández Rodríguez, Henar Rebollo Rodrigo, Magda Campins, Rafael L. Perez, F.M. González-Roncero, Deepali Kumar, Yang-Jen Chiang, Karen Doucette, Lissa Pipeleers, María Luisa Rodriguez Ferrero, Antonio Secchi, Shelly McNeil, Laura Cámpora, Emmanuel Di Paolo, Mohamed El Idrissi, Marta López‐Fauqued, Bruno Salaun, Thomas C. Heineman, Lidia Oostvogels

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHerpesvirus Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsNova Scotia Health AuthorityIzaak Walton Killam Health CentreDalhousie UniversityUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoUniversity of AlbertaSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineReactogenicityAdverse effectImmunogenicityPlacebomyalgiaImmunologyAdjuvantClinical trialInternal medicineImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The efficacy of the non-live adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV, containing a truncated form of varicella-zoster glycoprotein E [gE] and Adjuvant System AS01B) is >90% in adults ≥50 years of age (YOA) (ZOE-50/70) and >68% in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients ≥18 YOA (ZOE-HSCT).1 This study (NCT02058589) evaluated immunogenicity and safety of RZV in renal transplant recipients ≥18 YOA receiving immunosuppressive therapy. Previously unreported reactogenicity and 12-month post-last dose safety and immune persistence data are presented. In this phase III, 1:1 randomized, observer-blind, multicenter trial, patients received 2 doses of RZV or placebo. gE-specific immune responses were assessed at 1 (M2) and 12 (M13) months post-dose 2: humoral immunity by vaccine response rate (VRR) and geometric mean antibody concentration (GMC), and cell-mediated immunity (CMI) by VRR and CD4+ T-cell frequency. Solicited general and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) were collected 7 days pre-dose 1 as a within-participant control. Solicited and unsolicited AEs were also recorded for 7 and 30 days after each dose, respectively. Serious AEs (SAE) and potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs) were recorded up to study end (M13). Humoral and CMI in the RZV group persisted through M13 appearing higher in the RZV group vs. placebo (Table 1). The frequency of solicited local AEs and of general AEs myalgia and fever was higher in the RZV group vs. placebo and balanced between study groups for the other general AEs, pIMDs and SAEs (including allograft rejections) (Table 2, Figure 1). No concerns regarding renal function were reported. Suspected HZ cases were recorded among 2 RZV and 6 placebo recipients. In the RZV group, within-participant pre- and post-vaccination solicited general AEs were reported at similar rates for fatigue, gastrointestinal symptoms and headache, and higher rates post-vaccination for myalgia, shivering, and fever (Figure 1). RZV was highly immunogenic, eliciting robust humoral and CMI that persisted up to 12 months in adult renal transplant recipients. No safety concerns were identified over a 1-year follow-up. Reference 1. de la Serna, BMT Tandem Meeting 2018, abs LBA2. Funding: GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA P. Vink, GSK group of companies: Employee and Shareholder, Salary and stock shares. S. J. Kim, GSK group of companies: Investigator, Research grant and Research support. M. Campins Marti, GSK group of companies: Consultant, Investigator, Scientific Advisor and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research grant and Speaker honorarium. D. Kumar, GSK group of companies: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee. K. Doucette, GSK group of companies: Investigator, Research support. S. A. McNeil, GSK group of companies: Grant Investigator, Research grant and Research support. L. Campora, GSK group of companies: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. E. Di Paolo, GSK group of companies: Employee, Salary. M. El Idrissi, GSK group of companies: Employee, Salary. M. López-Fauqued, GSK group of companies: Employee, Salary. B. Salaun, GSK group of companies: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. T. Heineman, GSK group of companies: Consultant, Employee and Shareholder, Consulting fee and Salary. L. Oostvogels, GSK group of companies: Employee, Salary and stock and stock option.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicHerpesvirus Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207