MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2901969929 · doi:10.4212/cjhp.v45i2.2613

New Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Agents: A Review

2018· review· en· W2901969929 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Jim Lin, Raymond M. Reilly

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMyocardial perfusion imagingPerfusionMedicineThalliumNuclear medicineIschemiaPerfusion scanningGamma cameraTechnetiumNecrosisCardiologyInternal medicineChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Thallium-201 ( 201 T1) has been the most commonly used agent for myocardial perfusion imaging. Its uptake is proportional to myocardial blood flow. Its ability to redistribute with time is useful in differentiating between ischemia and necrosis. However, its gamma energy is suboptimal for imaging and its three day half-life presents a heavy radiation burden to the patient. Thus, new myocardial perfusion imaging agents have been developed. Two classes of perfusion imaging agents, the isonitrile complexes and BATO compounds are reviewed in this article. Of the isonitriles, Technetium 99m( 99m Tc)-sestamibi is the most promising. It exhibits a very good myocardium to background ratio which is reached at 1-1.5 hours post-injection. The radioisotope 99m Tc has an optimum gamma energy for imaging and a short half-life. 99m Tc-sestamibi does not redistribute and as such, two injections are required to distinguish between ischemia and necrosis. A same day rest-stress study can be carried out by having the two required doses in a 1:5 radioactivity ratio. The smaller dose is used for the rest study and the larger dose for the stress study. The BATO compound currently under study is 99m Tcteboroxime. It exhibits a very high and rapid myocardial uptake allowing images of the heart to be obtained at 1-2 minutes post-injection. Due to a very rapid clearance, a second dose of equal radioactivity can be given 1-2 hours later for the rest study. 99m Tc-teboroxime is currently not yet licensed for use in Canada. RESUME Le thallium 201 ( 201 Tl) est la substance la plus couramment utilisee en scintigraphie myocardique. La captation de cet element est proportionnelle au debit sanguin du myocarde. De plus, la redistribution du thallium avec le temps permet de distinguer l'ischemie de la necrose. Toutefois, le rayonnement gamma est inferieur au rayonnement optimal pour la scintigraphie et la demi-vie de trois jours de l'isotope exerce un lourd tribut sur le malade. On a donc mis au point de nouveaux produits pour la scintigraphie myocardique. Le present article en examine deux, les complexes isonitriles et les composes BATO. Parmi les isonitriles, le technetium 99m ( 99m Tc)-sestamibi parait le plus prometteur. Ce compose donne un excellent rapport entre le myocarde et le rayonnement de fond 1 a 1,5 heure apres l'injection. L'isotope 99m Tc a un rayonnement gamma optimal pour la scintigraphie et une breve demi-vie. Cependant, il n'y a pas redistribution, ce qui necessite deux injections si on veut faire la distinction entre l'ischemie et la necrose. On peut neanmoins effectuer un examen au repos et un autre sous contrainte la meme journee en injectant les deux doses requises selon un rapport de radioactivite de 1:5. La plus petite dose servira a l'examen au repos tandis que la seconde ira a la scintigraphie d'effort. Le compose BATO a l’etude est le 99m Tc-teboroxim. Ce produit est capte rapidement par le myocarde et en tres grande quantite, ce qui permet d'obtenir une image du coeur 1 ou 2 minutes apres l'injection. Une clairance tres rapide autorise l’administration d'une deuxieme dose de meme puissance radioactive 1 ou 2 heures plus tard, pour la scintigraphie au repos. A l’heure actuelle, le 99m Tc-teboroxime n'est pas commercialise au Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy→Same topicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications→French-language works237,207→