MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901974669 · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.11.035

Efficacy and Safety of Abrilumab in a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial for Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis

2018· article· en· W2901974669 on OpenAlexaff
William J. Sandborn, Marcoli Cyrille, Mark Berner Hansen, Brian G. Feagan, Edward V. Loftus, Gerhard Rogler, Séverine Vermeire, Martha L. Cruz, Jun Yang, Michael Boedigheimer, Lubna Abuqayyas, Christine M. Evangelista, Barbara Sullivan, Walter Reinisch

Bibliographic record

VenueGastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsRobarts Clinical TrialsWestern University
FundersAstraZenecaAmgen
KeywordsPlaceboMedicineUlcerative colitisGastroenterologyInternal medicineOdds ratioClinical endpointConfidence intervalRandomized controlled trialDoseInflammatory bowel diseaseSurgeryDiseasePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background & Aims The α 4 β 7 integrin is a validated target in inflammatory bowel disease. This randomized, phase 2b, placebo-controlled, double-blind study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the anti-α 4 β 7 antibody abrilumab in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis despite treatment with conventional therapies. Methods Patients (total Mayo Score 6–12, recto-sigmoidoscopy score ≥2) with inadequate response or intolerance to conventional therapies were randomized to receive subcutaneous abrilumab (7, 21, or 70 mg) on day 1, weeks 2 and 4, and every 4 weeks; abrilumab 210 mg on day 1; or placebo. The primary end point was remission (total Mayo Score ≤2 points, no individual sub-score >1 point) for the 2 highest dosages at week 8. Key secondary end points were response and mucosal healing (centrally read) at week 8. Results For 354 patients who received ≥1 dose of investigational product (placebo, n = 116; 7 mg, n = 21; 21 mg, n = 40; 70 mg, n = 98; 210 mg, n = 79), non-adjusted remission rates at week 8 were 4.3%, 13.3%, and 12.7% for the placebo and abrilumab 70-mg and 210-mg groups, respectively ( P < .05 for 70 and 210 mg vs placebo); odds of achieving remission were significantly greater with abrilumab 70 mg (odds ratio 3.35; 90% CI 1.41–7.95; P = .021) and 210 mg (odds ratio 3.33; 90% confidence interval 1.34–8.26; P = .030) than with placebo. Response and mucosal healing rates with these dosages also were significantly greater than with placebo. Higher baseline α 4 β 7 levels on naïve CD4 + T cells were a prognostic indicator for overall outcome, but not a predictive biomarker of abrilumab response. There were no cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy or deaths. Conclusions Abrilumab treatment for 8 weeks induced remission, clinical response, and mucosal healing in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01694485.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations87
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueGastroenterologySame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207