MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2902046728 · doi:10.1002/ana.25342

Neuroimaging and clinical outcomes of oral anticoagulant–associated intracerebral hemorrhage

2018· review· en· W2902046728 on OpenAlexaff
Georgios Tsivgoulis, Duncan Wilson, Aristeidis H. Katsanos, João Sargento‐Freitas, Cláudia Marques‐Matos, Elsa Azevedo, Tomohide Adachi, Christian von der Brelie, Yoshifusa Aizawa, Hiroshi Abe, Hirofumi Tomita, Ken Okumura, Joji Hagii, David Seiffge, Vasileios‐Arsenios Lioutas, Christopher Traenka, Panayiotis N. Varelas, Ghazala Basir, Christos Krogias, Jan Purrucker, Vijay K. Sharma, Timolaos Rizos, Robert Mikulík, Oluwaseun A. Sobowale, Kristian Barlinn, Hanne Sallinen, Nitin Goyal, Shin‐Joe Yeh, Theodoros Karapanayiotides, Teddy Y. Wu, Κonstantinos Vadikolias, Marc Ferrigno, Georgios M. Hadjigeorgiou, Rik Houben, Sotirios Giannopoulos, Floris H.B.M. Schreuder, Jason J. Chang, Luke A. Perry, H. Maximilian Mehdorn, João Pedro Marto, João Pinho, Jun Tanaka, Marion Boulanger, Rustam Al‐Shahi Salman, Hans Rolf Jäger, Clare Shakeshaft, Yusuke Yakushiji, Philip Choi, Julie Staals, Charlotte Cordonnier, Jiann‐Shing Jeng, Roland Veltkamp, Dar Dowlatshahi, Stefan T. Engelter, Adrian Parry‐Jones, Atte Meretoja, Panayiotis Mitsias, Andrei V. Alexandrov, Gareth Ambler, David J. Werring

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Neurology · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
FundersBritish Heart Foundation
KeywordsNeuroimagingIntracerebral hemorrhageMedicineOral anticoagulantAnticoagulantIntensive care medicineSurgeryInternal medicinePsychiatryWarfarinSubarachnoid hemorrhageAtrial fibrillation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective Whether intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) associated with non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC‐ICH) has a better outcome compared to ICH associated with vitamin K antagonists (VKA‐ICH) is uncertain. Methods We performed a systematic review and individual patient data meta‐analysis of cohort studies comparing clinical and radiological outcomes between NOAC‐ICH and VKA‐ICH patients. The primary outcome measure was 30‐day all‐cause mortality. All outcomes were assessed in multivariate regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, ICH location, and intraventricular hemorrhage extension. Results We included 7 eligible studies comprising 219 NOAC‐ICH and 831 VKA‐ICH patients (mean age = 77 years, 52.5% females). The 30‐day mortality was similar between NOAC‐ICH and VKA‐ICH (24.3% vs 26.5%; hazard ratio = 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.67–1.31). However, in multivariate analyses adjusting for potential confounders, NOAC‐ICH was associated with lower admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (linear regression coefficient = −2.83, 95% CI = −5.28 to −0.38), lower likelihood of severe stroke (NIHSS > 10 points) on admission (odds ratio [OR] = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.30–0.84), and smaller baseline hematoma volume (linear regression coefficient = −0.24, 95% CI = −0.47 to −0.16). The two groups did not differ in the likelihood of baseline hematoma volume < 30cm3 (OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 0.81–1.62), hematoma expansion (OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.63–1.48), in‐hospital mortality (OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.49–1.11), functional status at discharge (common OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.57–1.07), or functional status at 3 months (common OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.75–1.43). Interpretation Although functional outcome at discharge, 1 month, or 3 months was comparable after NOAC‐ICH and VKA‐ICH, patients with NOAC‐ICH had smaller baseline hematoma volumes and less severe acute stroke syndromes. Ann Neurol 2018;84:702–712

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.011
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.211
GPT teacher head0.473
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations68
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of NeurologySame topicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchFrench-language works237,207