MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2902083940 · doi:10.14740/jocmr3649

Persistent Primitive Hypoglossal Artery Associated With Multiple Cerebral Aneurysms

2018· article· en· W2902083940 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rikako Yabuki, Eiichi Baba, Kazutaka Shirokane, Atsushi Tsuchiya, Motohiro Nomura

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Medicine Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJapan Organization of Occupational Health and Safety
KeywordsMedicineCerebral arteriesAneurysmSubarachnoid hemorrhageBasilar arteryAnastomosisMiddle cerebral arteryAnterior cerebral arteryArteryAnatomyCraniotomyPosterior communicating arteryPosterior cerebral arteryCardiologySurgeryIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Persistent primitive hypoglossal artery is a rare anastomosis between the carotid and basilar arteries, and sometimes associated with cerebral aneurysms. However, association of persistent primitive hypoglossal artery with aneurysms located on arteries other than persistent primitive hypoglossal artery itself or posterior circulation is very rare. An 80-year-old woman suffered from subarachnoid hemorrhage, whose angiography demonstrated aneurysms on the left middle cerebral artery and anterior communicating artery, and the left persistent primitive hypoglossal artery. The middle cerebral artery aneurysm was the origin of hemorrhage. Although repeated craniotomy was necessary for the left middle cerebral artery aneurysm, both aneurysms were successfully clipped. In our case, neither aneurysm was located on an artery related to the persistent primitive hypoglossal artery. There is a possibility that cases of persistent primitive hypoglossal artery are accompanied by cerebral aneurysms on arteries other than the persistent primitive hypoglossal artery or in the posterior circulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.201
GPT teacher head0.459
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Medicine ResearchSame topicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207