MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2902337921 · doi:10.1149/2.0041812jss

Editors' Choice—Optical Emission from Germanium Nanocrystals

2018· article· en· W2902337921 on OpenAlexaff
N. L. Rowell, D. J. Lockwood, D. C. Houghton, J.-P. Noël, J.‐M. Baribeau

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSilicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
FundersCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique
KeywordsMaterials sciencePhononExcitonPhotoluminescenceGermaniumMolecular beam epitaxyEpitaxyRaman spectroscopyRaman scatteringLattice (music)NanocrystalScatteringBinding energyCondensed matter physicsMolecular physicsOptoelectronicsNanotechnologyLayer (electronics)Atomic physicsOpticsSiliconPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We analyze the intense photoluminescence (PL) observed at energies from 600 to 1100 meV for a large number of Si 1-x Ge x epitaxial layers grown by molecular beam epitaxy. In the present work we show that this previously unexplained broad PL peak can be assigned to Ge nanocrystals (NCs) self-assembled within the SiGe layers. These NCs are assumed to be lattice matched to the SiGe in the vertical, growth direction. A consequence of this assignment is that as the Ge-fraction in the SiGe layer increases the vertical strain in the NCs changes from compressive to tensile at x ∼ 0.36, lowering the NC bandgap (BG) below that of bulk Ge. We examine the PL results for more than 60 samples exhibiting this broad PL peak by examining how it follows the strained Ge BG for x from 0.05 to 0.53. The PL is resolvable as two narrower peaks separated by the momentum conserving phonon energy for Ge. Strain and confinement shifted NC bound exciton energies calculated numerically agree well with the measured ones. When Raman scattering results were examined for some of the same samples, the phonon mode frequencies obtained provided valuable corroborative evidence for the presence of the Ge NCs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.172

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0510.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Journal of Solid State Science and TechnologySame topicSilicon Nanostructures and PhotoluminescenceFrench-language works237,207