MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2902357931 · doi:10.1080/09737766.2018.1501923

A global perspective of bioaccumulation research using bibliometric analysis

2018· article· en· W2902357931 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lei Jing, Hui‐Zhen Fu, Yuh‐Shan Ho

Bibliographic record

VenueCollnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicToxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBioaccumulationEnvironmental chemistryEnvironmental scienceMercury (programming language)ChemistryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Contaminant bioaccumulation has long been used as a key indicator of the potential risk and toxic effects of contaminants to the environment and human health. In the present study, a bibliometric analysis based on the Science Citation Index Expanded from Thomson Reuters’ Web of Science Core Collection was carried out to gain insights into research activities and tendencies of global bioaccumulation from 1991 to 2014. Study emphases included performance of annual outputs, countries, institutions, Web of Science categories, journals, research hotspots, and articles with lasting impacts. Results indicated that annual outputs of the bioaccumulation articles increased steadily in 1991 to 2014. USA dominated the bioaccumulation field, followed by China, Canada, and France. Government agencies, such as Environment Canada and the US Environmental Protection Agency were the leading institutions in bioaccumulation research. The most prolific and promising category was environmental science, which was significantly ahead of other categories, such as toxicology, marine and freshwater biology, as well as environmental engineering. The bioaccumulation articles were dispersed in 1,267 journals, whereas half of the articles reside on 19 core journals. Research focuses and hot issues in the bioaccumulation field were evaluated by word cluster analysis. Toxic effects, exposure, risk analysis and/or assessment, as well as bioavailability of chemicals, are major concerns in the bioaccumulation field. Metals, such as mercury, cadmium, copper, lead, and arsenic, were contaminants of greatest concern, among which mercury was the most studied. Persistent organic pollutants, such as polychlorinated biphenyl, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and organochlorine compounds, were also very significant in the study of bioaccumulation. Substances with lasting impact were evaluated by citation lives of top articles. Perfluorooctane sulfonate and methylmercury have lasting impacts for their unusual routes in bioaccumulation. Moreover, methodological innovations in acquiring food chain position with stable nitrogen isotopes played an important role in bioaccumulation research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesBibliometrics
Consensus categoriesBibliometrics
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.700
Threshold uncertainty score0.922

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0880.427
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCollnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information ManagementSame topicToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactFrench-language works237,207