MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2902371663 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1465

1809. Improved Vancomycin Utilization With Rapidly Available Xpert MRSA/SA BC PCR and Microbiologist Case Review

2018· article· en· W2902371663 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lisa Li, Piera T. Calissi, Edith Blondel-Hill, Bing Wang, Amanda Wilmer

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Canadian institutionsInterior HealthUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVancomycinBacteremiaStaphylococcus aureusInternal medicineMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureusAntibioticsDaptomycinMicrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections are life threatening, and are empirically treated with vancomycin. Our objective was to assess the impact of a rapidly available PCR for methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) on the amount and duration of vancomycin use in methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) bloodstream infections. In October 2016, the Xpert® MRSA/SA BC assay, a PCR to detect MRSA from blood cultures, was implemented at Kelowna General Hospital. MRSA PCR was performed on one bottle per episode for blood cultures with Gram-positive cocci in clusters in at least 3/4 bottles. The medical microbiologist promptly phoned the most responsible physician with results to streamline antibiotics. All episodes of MSSA bacteremia between January 1, 2013 to September 30, 2016 (pre-implementation group) and November 1, 2016 to January 31, 2018 (post-implementation group), were matched to corresponding vancomycin defined daily doses (DDD) and days of therapy (DOT) in pharmacy records. Patients with ≥5 DOTs were excluded if they had allergies to β-lactams, polymicrobial infections with organisms requiring vancomycin, were on hemodialysis (vancomycin convenience dosing), or were transferred from another hospital with known S. aureus bacteremia. Mean vancomycin DDDs and DOTs, and the proportion of patients receiving at least one dose of vancomycin, were compared between groups. Categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square test, while continuous variables were compared using the t-test. In the pre-PCR group, 383 episodes of MSSA bacteremia were identified, with 21 excluded. In the post-PCR group, 100 episodes were found, with 3 excluded. Significantly more patients received at least one dose of vancomycin in the pre-PCR (70.2%) compared with the post-PCR group (54.6%) (P < 0.01). The mean DDD was 1.5 in the post-PCR group, less than the pre-PCR group at 2.8 (P < 0.01). The mean DOT also decreased, with the post-PCR group receiving less vancomycin (1.6 days) compared with the pre-PCR group (2.5 days) (P < 0.01). Rapidly available MRSA PCR for S. aureus bloodstream infection coupled with antimicrobial stewardship performed by medical microbiologists led to a significant decrease in vancomycin use. All authors: No reported disclosures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicAntimicrobial Resistance in StaphylococcusFrench-language works237,207