Paroxysmal Sympathetic Hyperactivity After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Children: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Outcome*
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity in pediatric patients with severe traumatic brain injury using the new consensus definition, the risk factors associated with developing paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity, and the outcomes associated with paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Academic children's hospital PICU. PATIENTS: All pediatric patients more than 1 month and less than 18 years old with severe traumatic brain injury between 2000 and 2016. We excluded patients if they had a history of five possible confounders for paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity diagnosis or if they died within 24 hours of admission for traumatic brain injury. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Our primary outcome was PICU mortality. One hundred seventy-nine patients met inclusion criteria. Thirty-six patients (20%) had at least eight criteria and therefore met classification of "likelihood of paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity." Older age was the only factor independently associated with developing paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity (odds ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.00-1.16). PICU mortality was significantly lower for those with paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity compared with those without paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity (odds ratio, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.01-0.52), but PICU length of stay was greater in those with paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity (odds ratio, 4.36; 95% CI, 2.94-5.78), and discharge to an acute care or rehabilitation setting versus home was higher in those with paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity (odds ratio, 5.59; 95% CI, 1.26-24.84; odds ratio, 5.39; 95% CI, 1.87-15.57, respectively). When paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity was diagnosed in the first week of admission, it was not associated with discharge disposition. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the rate of paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity in patients with severe traumatic brain injury is higher than previously reported. Older age was associated with an increased risk for developing paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity, but severity of the trauma and the brain injury were not. For survivors of severe traumatic brain injury beyond 24 hours who developed paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity, there was a lower PICU mortality but also greater PICU length of stay and a lower likelihood of discharge home from the admitting hospital, suggesting that functional outcome in survivors with paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity is worse than survivors without paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".