Quantification of Mg2+, Ca2+ and H+ transport by the gastrointestinal tract of the goldfish, Carassius auratus, using the Scanning Ion-selective Electrode Technique (SIET)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An in vitro gut-sac technique and the scanning ion-selective electrode technique (SIET) were used to characterize Mg2+, Ca2+, and H+ transport at both the mucosal and serosal surfaces of non-everted and everted gastrointestinal tissues obtained from Carassius auratus. As part of the study, two magnesium ionophores were compared (II vs. VI). Unfed animals displayed uniform transport of all ions along the intestine. Feeding resulted in elevated Mg2+ and Ca2+ transport when the gut lumen contained chyme however, under symmetrical conditions this increased transport rate was absent. Furthermore, zonation of divalent cation transport was present for both Ca2+ and Mg2+ under non-symmetrical conditions while the zonation remained for Ca2+ alone under symmetrical conditions. High dietary Mg2+ decreased absorption and induced secretion of Mg2+ in the posterior intestine. Uptake kinetics in the esophagus suggest large diffusive and/or convective components based on a linear relationship between Mg2+ transport and concentration and lack of inhibition by ouabain, an inhibitor of Na+-K+-ATPase. In contrast, kinetics in the rectum were suggestive of a low affinity, saturable carrier-mediated pathway. A decrease in Mg2+ and Ca2+ transport was observed in the posterior intestine (both at the mucosal and serosal surfaces) in response to ouabain. This impact was greatest for Ca2+ transport and when applied to the mucosal fluid and measured in everted preparations. In contrast a putative Mg2+ transport inhibitor, cobalt(III)hexamine-chloride, did not affect Mg2+ transport. This is the first study to use SIET approaches to study ion transport in the gut of teleost fish. This is also the first study to provide characterization of Mg2+ transport in the gut of C. auratus. Due to the limited selectivity of Magnesium ionophore II, subsequent studies of tissues bathed in physiological saline should be made using Magnesium Ionophore VI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".