MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2902631226 · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2018.293530

A Streamlined Method for Quantification of Apolipoprotein A1 in Human Plasma by LC-MS/MS

2018· letter· en· W2902631226 on OpenAlexafffund
Junyan Shi, Yu Zi Zheng, Don D. Sin, Mari L. DeMarco

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Chemistry · 2018
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsProvidence Health CareSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchGenome British ColumbiaGenome Canada
KeywordsHuman plasmaChromatographyApolipoprotein BChemistryBiochemistryCholesterol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To the Editor: Apolipoprotein A1 (apoA1) is the major protein component of high-density lipoprotein particles in blood, and its concentration in serum and plasma is a marker of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases. Clinical laboratories commonly use immunometric methods to measure apoA1; however, an alternative approach, LC-MS/MS, has been proposed (1–3). Uptake of these LC-MS/MS methods for routine testing in a clinical setting has been challenging owing to complex and time-intensive sample preparation work flows. Overnight digestion has been previously applied for quantification of apoA1 by use of proteolytic peptides VQPYLDDFQK, DYVSQFEGSALGK, and THLAPYSDELR (1, 2) and a 3-h digest using peptide VQPYLDDFQK (3). Toward the design of a streamlined work flow for implementation in a clinical laboratory, we simplified sample preparation by using only additive steps and eliminating the use of chemical denaturants, reduction, and alkylation. Herein we demonstrate that such a simple and rapid work flow, targeting a fast-forming proteolytic peptide, can be used to develop a quantitative apoA1 LC-MS/MS assay in agreement with an established immunonephelometric method. Our optimized protocol generated several proteotypic peptides suitable for apoA1 quantification by using a brief 20-min digestion without reduction or alkylation steps or the use of chemical denaturants. On the basis of several factors including the 24-h digestion profile (4), THLAPYSDELR was selected for further development. To generate the external 6-point calibration curve, the unlabeled THLAPYSDELR peptide was synthesized, with purity determined by high-performance LC and amino acid analysis (New England Peptide). The lyophilized peptide stocks were initially solubilized in a 5% acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid solution and further diluted with …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.414
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.414
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical ChemistrySame topicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207