MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2902725751 · doi:10.3329/taj.v30i2.39132

A Comparative Study of the Effects of Lateral Wedge Insole Shoe Modification on the Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis

2018· article· en· W2902725751 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Md Tariqul Islam Khan, Badrunnesa Ahmed, AKM Salek, Fazlul Karim

Bibliographic record

VenueTAJ Journal of Teachers Association · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOsteoarthritisWOMACPhysical therapyKnee painRehabilitationIsometric exerciseKnee JointSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is the common form of disability in comparatively elderly patient. Lateral wedge shoe insole is an easy, simple and cost effective approach which can be applied as an adjunct to pharmacotherapy to treat the patients with OA knee. The objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of using lateral wedge shoe insole on pain and physical functioning in patients with OA knee.Method: A randomized prospective study was carried out in the department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh from January, 2012 to March, 2012. Patients with OA knee by American College of Rheumatology Criteria were selected. Two intervention groups were compared. In patients of Group-A (32 patients) were treated with aceclofenac100mg and, omeprazole20mg bid, and daily instructions of activities of daily living (ADLs), isometric quadriceps muscle strengthening exercise. Patients of Group-B were given lateral wedge shoe insole along with above treatment. The change between two weeks post intervention and baseline WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities) subscale and scores were calculated. There were 4 visits and in each visit, patients were assessed for pain, stiffness and physical function by WOMAC index.Results: A total 65 patients with OA knee were included in this study. The mean age was 56.5± 10 years. Male to female ratio was 1.32:1. Comparison of mean pretreatment and 8th week post treatment WOMAC physical function subscale score in Group A (4.9 ± 1.2 vs. 2.4 ± 0.8) showed significant improvement and in Group B (4.3 ± 1.2 vs. 1.9 ± 0.5) which also shows significant improvement more than group A. The result was compared and student t-test was done to see the level of significance. Method was found significant after treatment (p <0.05).Interpretation: Effects of use of lateral wedge shoe insole in patients with knee OA is beneficial.TAJ 2017; 30(2): 13-19

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.209

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTAJ Journal of Teachers AssociationSame topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207