MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2902774269 · doi:10.20884/1.jks.2018.13.2.763

Determinants of Diabetes Self Care in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Banyumas Regency

2018· article· id· W2902774269 on OpenAlexaff
Eva Rahayu, Ridlwan Kamaluddin, Eti Dwi Hapsari

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Keperawatan Soedirman · 2018
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldMedicine
TopicPublic Health and Nutrition
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p align="center"><strong>DETERMINANTS OF DIABETES SELF-CARE ON PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS IN BANYUMAS REGENCY</strong></p><p align="center"><strong>Eva Rahayu, </strong><strong>Ridlwan Kamaluddin</strong><strong>, Eti Dwi Hapsari</strong></p><p align="center">Lecturer of Nursing Department, Jenderal Soedirman University</p><p align="center">“ummufawwaz.rahayu@gmail.com”</p><p align="center"> </p><p align="center"><strong>ABSTRAK</strong></p><p>Penderita diabetes tipe 2 perlu menerapkan perawatan mandiri diabetes dalam rangka meminimalisir berbagai komplikasi dan penurunan kualitas hidup. Beberapa faktor diduga memiliki pengaruh terhadap penerapan perawatan mandiri<em> </em>diabetes oleh penderita diabetestipe 2 di Kabupaten Banyumas. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui faktor determinan yang berhubungan dengan penerapan perawatan mandiri<em> </em>diabetes tipe 2 di Wilayah Kabupaten Banyumas. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain <em>cross sectional</em>. Populasi adalah seluruh penderita diabetes melitus tipe 2 se-Kabupaten Banyumas. Metode penarikan sample dengan teknik <em>cluster sampling</em> dengan besar sampel 532 orang yang tersebar di 22 puskesmas se-Kabupaten Banyumas. Analisis data menggunakan uji korelasi Spearman dan Regresi Linier Ganda. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan nilai p pada masing–masing variabel yang dihubungkan dengan <em>perawatan mandiri</em> diabetes antara lain adalah jenis kelamin (p=0,043),usia (p=0,18), lama menderita diabetes (p= 0,11) pengetahuan (p=0,000), motivasi (=0,01), serta dukungan keluarga (p= 0,000). Sebesar 10,4 % variasi perawatan mandiri diabetes dapat dijelaskan oleh variabel pengetahuan dengan koefisien β = 0,32. Kesimpulan penelitian adalah ada hubungan antara jenis kelamin, pengetahuan, motivasi dan dukungan keluarga dengan perawatan mandiri diabetes. Variabel pengetahuan menjadi faktor yang paling dominan berhubungan dengan perawatan mandiri diabetes<em>.</em></p><p><strong>Kata kunci : </strong>determinan, diabetes melitus<em>, </em>perawatan mandiri<em> </em>diabetes</p><p align="center"><strong> </strong></p><p align="center"><strong> </strong></p><p align="center"><strong> </strong></p><p align="center"><strong>ABSTRACT</strong></p><p align="center"><strong> </strong></p><p>Patients with type 2 diabetes need to apply self-care in order to minimize various complications and decreasing quality of life. Several factors are assumed to have an effect on the application of diabetes self-care by patients with type 2 diabetes in Banyumas Regency. The purpose of this research was to determine the determinants related to the application of diabetes self care by patients withtype 2 diabetesin Banyumas Regency. This research used cross sectional design. Population was all patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Banyumas Regency. Sampling method was performed by cluster sampling technique with sample size of 532 patients spreading in 22 community health centers (Puskesmas) in Banyumas Regency. Data analysis used Spearman correlation test and Multiple Linear Regression. The result indicated that p value in each variable affecting diabetes self-care was gender (p=0,043), age (p=0.18), duration of diabetes (p= 0.11) , knowledge (p=0.000), motivation (=0.01), and family support (p= 0.000). 10.4 % variation in diabetes self-care can be explained by knowledge variable with the coefficient β = 0.32. It can be concluded that there was a relationship among gender, knowledge, motivation and family support on diabetes self-care. Knowledge variable was the most dominant factor related to diabetes self-care.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><br clear="ALL" /><p><strong>Keywords</strong><strong> : </strong>determinants, diabetes mellitus, diabetes self-care</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Keperawatan SoedirmanSame topicPublic Health and NutritionFrench-language works237,207