MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2902775576 · doi:10.1111/jnc.14625

News and ISN

2018· article· en· W2902775576 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kazuhiro Ikenaka

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurochemistry · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAnesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHonorNeurochemistryMentorshipFeelingWifeSympathySorrowPseudonymLawPridePsychoanalysisSociologyPsychologyPolitical sciencePsychiatrySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dear Readers of the Journal of Neurochemistry, The Journal of Neurochemistry is the official journal of the International Society for Neurochemistry (ISN). ISN and our entire Neurochemistry community are suffering from a terrible loss as our President and good friend Professor Kazuhiro Ikenaka has finally lost his fight against cancer, passing away on October 27, 2018. ISN has not only lost a visionary President, a longtime dedicated ISN member and a brilliant neurochemist. We have all lost a kind and insightful friend who has served as a mentor to many and as a much needed and selfless bridge in many times of need. As a colleague and friend, we especially remember and will miss his humor, his thoughtful ideas, and his guidance. We will miss Kaz and his advice sadly. We have begun planning a commemoration to remember and honor Kaz at the next biennial meeting of ISN being held at Montreal in August 2019. We will celebrate his mentorship, his scientific achievements, and all the exceptional work that he has done for ISN and the entire worldwide neurochemistry community. For ISN, the ISN Council and the ISN membership, we have expressed our great sorrow, our deepest feelings and our sympathy to his wife, Yumiko, and his family. We will sorely miss Kaz as friend, mentor, and leader. Monica Carson, Interim ISN President Ralf Dringen, ISN Secretary Flávia Gomes, ISN Treasurer

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.256

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeurochemistrySame topicAnesthesia and Neurotoxicity ResearchFrench-language works237,207