Alexithymia pada Sampel Non Klinis: Keterkaitannya dengan Gaya Kelekatan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alexithymia is a personality trait characterized by difficulty identifying, describing, and experiencing feelings internally. Along with other circumstances, a high level of alexithymia and insecure attachment style may increase the potential of mental health problems. A cross-sectional empirical design was used to examine the mean level of alexithymia in nonclinical samples and the association between alexithymia and attachment styles. Participants (N= 95) were recruited using convenience sampling. Variables were measured using Indonesian versions of Toronto Alexithymia Scale 20 and Attachment Style Questionnaire. The result showed the prevalence of Alexithymia was higher compared to some other studies with nonclinical samples. Positive correlations were found between alexithymia and several attachment styles, and a negative one found with secure attachment styles. At the domain level, the results provided interesting cues related to culture and emotion. The clinical implication of this study was a cultural influence in individuals needs to be included in clinical observations. Abstrak. Alexithymia merupakan sebuah trait kepribadian yang dicirikan dengan kesulitan mengidentifikasi, menjelaskan, dan menghayati perasaan secara internal. Bersamaan denga n kondisi lainnya, tingkat alexithymia yang tinggi dan gaya kelekatan tidak aman dapat memperbesar potensi gangguan kesehatan mental. Tujuan penelitian ini melihat gambaran tingkat alexithymia dan kemudian bagaimana hubungannya dengan gaya kelekatan. Partisipan penelitian ini 95 laki-laki dan perempuan yang berusia di atas 18 tahun dengan convienience sampling dan menggunakan kuesioner self report Bahasa Indonesia, yaitu Torronto Alexithymia Scale 20 dan Attachment Style Questionnaire . Hasil penelitian menunjukkan prevalensi tingkat alexithymia yang lebih tinggi jika dibandingkan dengan penelitian pada sampel non klinis sebelumnya. Uji korelasi menunjukkan total skor alexithymia berkorelasi negatif dengan gaya kelekatan aman dan berkorelasi positif dengan gaya kelekatan tidak aman. Pada tataran domain terdapat petunjuk menarik yang berkaitan dengan kekhasan budaya dan ekspresi emosi. Implikasi hasil penelitian pada situasi klinis adalah praktisi perlu mengamati klien secara utuh dengan konteks yang meliputinya.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".