MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2902919966 · doi:10.1016/j.clinms.2018.11.003

Thyrotoxicosis due to 1000-fold error in compounded liothyronine: A case elucidated by mass spectrometry

2018· article· en· W2902919966 on OpenAlexaff
Wajid Khan, Grace van der Gugten, Daniel T. Holmes

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical mass spectrometry · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of British Columbia HospitalSt. Paul's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineThyroid stormNauseaVomitingPediatricsTriiodothyronineInternal medicineThyroidGastroenterology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thyrotoxicosis attributable exclusively to triiodothyronine (T3) is, by necessity, caused by accidental or intentional ingestion of pharmaceutical preparations. The clinical presentation of T3 overdose appears to differ from classic thyroid storm. A 30-year-old female patient presented serially to the emergency department with headache, nausea and vomiting. Neurological work-up was negative and she was treated for presumed viral gastroenteritis. Eventually she developed confusion and was admitted. Laboratory investigations showed a suppressed TSH and a free T3 above the linear range (>30 pmol/L), estimated by dilution in normal serum to be 330 pmol/L. She was diagnosed with thyrotoxicosis secondary to recently prescribed compounded liothyronine and was treated with seven rounds of plasmapheresis. Using a rapidly developed mass spectrometric method for T3, it was determined that compounding pharmacy had dispensed liothyronine at a concentration ≃1000-times the prescribed dosage. The clinical and mass spectrometry laboratories played an essential role in the diagnosis of thyroid storm in this case of T3 overdose as the expected clinical features of hyperpyrexia, tachycardia and hypertension were initially absent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0060.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical mass spectrometrySame topicThyroid Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207