MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2902953998 · doi:10.1186/s13104-018-3955-8

Isolation and characterization of camelid single-domain antibodies against HER2

2018· article· en· W2902953998 on OpenAlexafffund
Greg Hussack, Shalini Raphael, Michael J. Lowden, Kevin A. Henry

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Research Notes · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
FundersNational Research Council Canada
KeywordsPanning (audio)EctodomainSingle-domain antibodyRecombinant DNAEpitopeAntibodyBiologyMolecular biologyFlow cytometryEpitope mappingVirologyComputational biologyImmunologyGeneticsGeneReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To isolate and characterize novel high-affinity llama single-domain antibodies against human HER2. We immunized a llama with human HER2, constructed a phage-displayed V H H library from the lymphocytes of the animal, and isolated six unique HER2-specific V H Hs by panning. All six V H Hs were unique at the amino acid level and were clonally unrelated, as reflected by their distinct CDR3 lengths. All six V H Hs recognized recombinant human HER2 ectodomain with monovalent affinities ranging from 1 to 51 nM, had comparable affinities for cynomolgus monkey HER2, and bound HER2 + SKOV3 cells by flow cytometry. Three of the V H Hs recognized recombinant murine HER2 with no loss of affinity compared with human and cynomolgus monkey HER2. The V H Hs recognized three major epitopes on HER2 (including one conserved across the human, simian and murine orthologues), all of which were distinct from that of trastuzumab. These V H Hs may be useful in the design of modular cancer immunotherapeutics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.135
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Research NotesSame topicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchFrench-language works237,207