MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2902973673 · doi:10.1029/2018jc014289

Modeling the Near‐Surface Diurnal Cycle of Sea Surface Temperature in the Mediterranean Sea

2018· article· en· W2902973673 on OpenAlexafffund
Sam Pimentel, Wang-Hung Tse, Haiming Xu, Dimitra Denaxa, Eric Jansen, Γεράσιμος Κορρές, Isabelle Mirouze, Andrea Storto

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Oceans · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsTrinity Western UniversityWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSea surface temperatureClimatologyEnvironmental scienceDiurnal cycleMediterranean seaAtmospheric sciencesAtmospheric modelAtmosphere (unit)Mediterranean climateGeologyMeteorologyOceanographyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The diurnal cycle of sea surface temperature (SST) is an important component of the ocean‐atmosphere system and is necessary for accurately computing air‐sea heat fluxes. Ocean temperatures in the near‐surface are highly sensitive to atmospheric conditions and can vary significantly depending on time of day. Ocean general circulation models are unable to fully capture the near‐surface diurnal SST variability, because they do not possess the necessary vertical structure and resolution. Furthermore, SST observations come from a number of sources that represent the temperature at various near‐surface depths. This presents difficulties when assimilating SST observations as well as constructing robust climate records of SST. In this study we model the fine‐scale near‐surface structure allowing SST comparisons between foundation SST, SST at depth, subskin SST, and skin SST. Hourly model results, forced and initialized using readily available reanalysis data, are from a 2‐year period, 2013–2014, over the Mediterranean Sea. Various solar absorption parameterizations are examined, and the resulting SSTs are compared to Spinning Enhanced Visible and InfraRed Imager‐derived observations of the skin temperature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.567
Threshold uncertainty score0.630

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research OceansSame topicOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesFrench-language works237,207