MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2903016637 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofy210.2135

2482. Impact of a Recombinant Zoster Vaccine on Quality of Life: Data from a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Trial in Adult Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

2018· article· en· W2903016637 on OpenAlexaff
Desmond Curran, Αchilles Anagnostopoulos, İbrahim Barışta, Adriana Bastidas, Pranatharthi Chandrasekar, Michael Dickinson, Inmaculada Heras, Mohamed El Idrissi, Sean Matthews, Samuel T. Milliken, J.M. Coll, María Belén Navarro Matilla, Lidia Oostvogels, Dimas Quiel, Scott D. Rowley, Waleed Sabry, Dominik Selleslag, Jeff Szer, Koen Theunissen, Zeynep Arzu Yeğin, Su‐Peng Yeh, Jo‐Anne H. Young, Francesco Zaja

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHerpesvirus Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsSaskatchewan Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePlaceboQuality of life (healthcare)Randomized controlled trialInternal medicineHematopoietic stem cell transplantationClinical trialCohortVaccinationTransplantationImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Herpes zoster (HZ) and its complications can have a substantial impact on patients’ quality of life (QoL), particularly in immunocompromised patients. The vaccine efficacy (VE) of an adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) was studied in a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study in adult hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients (NCT01610414). The VE in preventing HZ cases was 68.2% (95% CI: 55.6%–77.5%). Herein we report the impact of the vaccine on patients’ quality of life (QoL) associated with HZ episodes. HSCT recipients were randomized 1:1 to receive 2 doses of RZV or placebo, given 1–2 months apart and followed for the occurrence of HZ. QoL parameters were measured by the Short-Form health survey (SF-36) and Euro-Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) at baseline, 1 month and 1 year post-dose 2, as well as during suspected HZ episodes in conjunction with the Zoster Brief Pain Inventory (ZBPI). For confirmed HZ cases, QoL scores were compared between the vaccine and placebo groups. The RZV impact in reducing the ZBPI Burden of Illness and Burden of Interference scores was estimated in patients in the modified total vaccinated cohort (mTVC). The 2 scores were calculated from the area under the curve (Days 0 to 182) of the ZBPI Worst Pain and ZBPI Activities of Daily Living scores, respectively, assuming a score of 0 for patients who did not have a confirmed HZ episode. Both the ZBPI maximum Worst Pain and Average Pain scores were significantly lower in the vaccine than placebo group (Table 1), suggesting less burden in breakthrough HZ cases following RZV. Consequently, the HZ Burden of Illness and Burden of Interference VE estimates were higher than the HZ VE estimate. RZV showed statistically significantly better QoL scores than placebo one week following rash-onset among patients with confirmed HZ, i.e., SF-36 bodily pain, social functioning, role emotional, mental health and mental component scores, and the EQ-5D Utility Score. In addition to reducing the risk of HZ and HZ complications, RZV significantly reduces the impact of HZ on patient’s QoL in those who develop breakthrough disease. Funding: GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA. D. Curran, GlaxoSmithKline: Employee, GSK Shares and Salary. A. Bastidas, GSK: Employee, Salary. M. El Idrissi, GSK: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. S. Matthews, GSK group of companies: Consultant, Consulting fee. L. Oostvogels, GSK group of companies: Employee, Salary and stock and stock option. J. A. Young, GSK: Investigator, The University of Minnesota is reimbursed for contract costs associated with conducting clinical trials of vaccine. I receive no personal financial benefit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicHerpesvirus Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207