MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2903029853 · doi:10.3749/canmin.1700050

Variation in Major and Trace Elements of Primary WÖhlerite As an Indicator of the Origin of Pegmatites in the Larvik Plutonic Complex, Norway

2018· article· en· W2903029853 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Øyvind Sunde, Henrik Friis, Tom Andersen

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPegmatiteGeologyGeochemistryPlutonPrimary (astronomy)Variation (astronomy)TRACE (psycholinguistics)MineralogySeismology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research Article| October 23, 2018 Variation in Major and Trace Elements of Primary WÖhlerite As an Indicator of the Origin of Pegmatites in the Larvik Plutonic Complex, Norway Øyvind Sunde; Øyvind Sunde § Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1172, Blindern, 0318 Oslo, Norway § Corresponding author e-mail address: oyvind.geologi@gmail.com Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Henrik Friis; Henrik Friis Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1172, Blindern, 0318 Oslo, Norway Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Tom Andersen Tom Andersen Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1047, Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar The Canadian Mineralogist (2018) 56 (4): 529–542. https://doi.org/10.3749/canmin.1700050 Article history first online: 23 Oct 2018 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Øyvind Sunde, Henrik Friis, Tom Andersen; Variation in Major and Trace Elements of Primary WÖhlerite As an Indicator of the Origin of Pegmatites in the Larvik Plutonic Complex, Norway. The Canadian Mineralogist 2018;; 56 (4): 529–542. doi: https://doi.org/10.3749/canmin.1700050 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentBy SocietyThe Canadian Mineralogist Search Advanced Search Abstract Wöhlerite is an abundant primary high field-strength element-bearing mineral in alkaline pegmatites occurring in the Permian Larvik Plutonic Complex in the Oslo Rift, Norway. Wöhlerite has a flexible crystal-chemical structure able to incorporate cations of different size and valence and is therefore a potential indicator mineral in mildly peralkaline systems. The major- and trace-element composition of wöhlerite from pegmatites across the complex has been studied as a potential geochemical proxy for the pegmatite-forming melt. The pegmatites are mainly confined to larvikite (i.e., hypersolvus monzonite) and nepheline syenite of the complex, but the genetic relationship between the pegmatites and their host rock is unclear. Pegmatites carrying primary wöhlerite were sampled from different sections of the complex to investigate whether or not compositional variations within the host larvikite were recorded in wöhlerite from the pegmatites. Rare-earth element distribution patterns of wöhlerite show that pegmatites associated with nepheline syenite are identical to pegmatites occurring in evolved larvikites, whereas wöhlerite from pegmatites situated in less-evolved larvikite shows different rare-earth element distributions. Variations in wöhlerite Fe/Mn atomic ratio agree with a model in which different intrusive members of the complex formed by emplacement of separate batches of larvikite magma. The relationship between Mn and Nb may also be explored as a means to discriminate between wöhlerite crystallized from different alkaline systems, e.g., nepheline syenitic or carbonatitic melts. You do not currently have access to this article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.407
Threshold uncertainty score0.808

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207