Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Plato’s Philebus, Socrates surprises us when he mentions, as if in passing, “all the tragedy and comedy of life” Of life itself. If the philosophical life is the examined life, one might assume that reflection on the comic aspects of life would have its proper place in philosophy. And if an examined life would be incomplete without a way of expressing itself, one might also assume that the Socratic dialogue is Plato’s unique attempt to develop a fitting literary form. The Symposium ends anticlimactically with Socrates trying to persuade Agathon and Aristophanes, both tired and drunk, that “the same man should know how to write comedy and tragedy.” In other words, that “a skilled tragedian is also a comedian”—a statement that is not a prefiguring of Shakespeare or Beckett, of course, but rather a hint Plato gives us about the nature of his art. It is conventional for scholars to note that these passages are called into question by the agreement reached in the Republic between Adeimantus and Socrates that the same person cannot be a skilled imitator in both tragedy and comedy, but I see no reason why the argument should not run the other way: the Symposiumand Philebus might call arguments in the Republic into question. Adeimantus is a sober fellow, after all, and a bit too precise. It might even have been his habit to leave the theatre before the satyr play came on.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".