MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2903151719 · doi:10.1109/tnet.2018.2879979

On Efficient Tree-Based Tag Search in Large-Scale RFID Systems

2018· article· en· W2903151719 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRFID technology advancements
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersBeijing Institute of TechnologyNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsNotationComputer scienceScale (ratio)Hash functionAlgorithmDiscrete mathematicsInformation retrievalMathematicsTheoretical computer scienceProgramming languageArithmetic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tag search, which is to find a particular set of tags in a radio frequency identification (RFID) system, is a key service in such important Internet-of-Things applications as inventory management. When the system scale is large with a massive number of tags, deterministic search can be prohibitively expensive, and probabilistic search has been advocated, seeking a balance between reliability and time efficiency. Given a failure probability <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\frac {1}{\mathcal {O}(K)}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> , where <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$K$ </tex-math></inline-formula> is the number of tags, state-of-the-art solutions have achieved a time cost of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\mathcal {O}(K \log K)$ </tex-math></inline-formula> through multi-round hashing and verification. Further improvement, however, faces a critical bottleneck of repetitively verifying each individual target tag in each round. In this paper, we present an efficient tree-based tag search (TTS) that approaches <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\mathcal {O}(K)$ </tex-math></inline-formula> through batched verification. The key novelty of TTS is to smartly hash multiple tags into each internal tree node and adaptively control the node degrees. It conducts bottom–up search to verify tags group by group with the number of groups decreasing rapidly. Furthermore, we design an enhanced tag search scheme, referred to as TTS+, to overcome the negative impact of asymmetric tag set sizes on time efficiency of TTS. TTS+ first rules out partial ineligible tags with a filtering vector and feeds the shrunk tag sets into TTS. We derive the optimal hash code length and node degrees in TTS to accommodate hash collisions and the optimal filtering vector size to minimize the time cost of TTS+. The superiority of TTS and TTS+ over the state-of-the-art solution is demonstrated through both theoretical analysis and extensive simulations. Specifically, as reliability demand on scales, the time efficiency of TTS+ reaches nearly 2 times at most that of TTS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.644
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it