MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2903170064

Ciclones no oceano Atlântico Norte: clima actual e cenário futuro

2011· dissertation· pt· W2903170064 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tiago Filipe Costa Rodrigues

Bibliographic record

VenuePortuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) · 2011
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCoastal and Marine Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyHumanitiesGeologyHistoryPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este trabalho estuda a actividade ciclonica verificada na regiao do Atlantico Norte no clima actual e num cenario climatico futuro. Para tal aplicou-se o algoritmo de deteccao/tracking desenvolvido pela Universidade de Melbourne a quatro conjuntos de dados diferentes: reanalises ERA40 e NCEP I (clima actual), e modelos climaticos ECHAM5 e CCSM3 (clima actual e futuro). O clima actual refere-se ao periodo entre 1971 e 2000, e o cenario climatico futuro refere-se ao periodo 2071-2100. Para o clima futuro e considerado o cenario A2 do quarto relatorio do IPCC. O estudo recai sobre uma regiao centrada no Atlantico norte sendo as fronteiras do dominio considerado definidas pelos limites: 85W - 15E, 25N - 70N. Sao apresentadas climatologias de diversas caracteristicas dos ciclones, bem como as tendencias observadas nos dois climas referidos. Faz-se, tambem, uma comparacao entre as reanalises NCEP I e ERA40. Atraves do estudo realizado para o clima actual foi possivel verificar que grande parte da actividade ciclonica centra-se nas latitudes mais elevadas do dominio. E aqui que se registam maximos de intensidade, profundidade, numero de sistemas, e minimos de pressao central. Este periodo apresenta, tambem, uma tendencia para o aumento da intensidade dos ciclones proximo da Peninsula Escandinavia e norte do Canada, verificando-se um aumento do laplaciano medio da pressao em aproximadamente 0.006 e 0.004 hPa .lat -2 ano-1 respectivamente. Apesar do elevado grau de concordancia verificado entre as reanalises NCEP I e ERA40, verificou-se que as NCEP I tendem a produzir mais sistemas nas latitudes elevadas e menos nas latitudes mais baixas durante o inverno. Os sistemas produzidos pelas reanalises NCEP I tendem, ainda, a ser de maior dimensao e menos intensos. Os modelos ECHAM5 e CCSM3 reproduzem correctamente as climatologias do periodo 1971-2000, possibilitando o seu uso paro o estudo de um clima futuro. Porem, os resultados obtidos para o clima futuro nao indicaram alteracoes substanciais ao verificado no periodo 1971-2000, com excepcao para uma ligeira reducao da intensidade dos ciclones, acompanhado de um deslocar para norte de aproximadamente 3. de latitude do maximo da media zonal de ciclones, no periodo de inverno.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.268
Threshold uncertainty score0.533

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePortuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)Same topicCoastal and Marine ManagementFrench-language works237,207