MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2903176198 · doi:10.1089/vor.2018.0564

Minimally Invasive Laryngoscopically Assisted Management of an Enlarging Fourth Branchial Remnant

2018· article· en· W2903176198 on OpenAlexaff
Etienne St‐Louis, Esther ShinHyun Kang, Kathryn LaRusso, Robin T. Petroze, Hussein Wissanji, Sam J. Daniel, Kenneth Shaw

Bibliographic record

VenueVideoscopy · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHead and Neck Anomalies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMontreal Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSurgeryPercutaneousCystSclerotherapySinus (botany)Radiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Third and fourth branchial cleft remnants usually present as cysts, sinuses, or fistulae. In this video, we show an exceptional case of an infected large fourth branchial cleft cyst with extension into the thoracic inlet and the novel therapeutic approach that was used to provide minimally invasive management of this lesion. The total run time of the video is 4 minutes and 12 seconds. Case Report: A premature female twin with known antenatal diagnosis of cystic left neck mass was found to have lymphatic malformation after physical examination and postnatal ultrasonography evaluation. The lesion did not interfere with the patient's airway or breathing, and, therefore, was of limited clinical significance, and the plan was to follow it clinically and with repeat ultrasonography at the time of discharge. After administration of vaccines and development of viral upper respiratory symptoms, the patient's left neck mass enlarged significantly, prompting further investigation with an MRI, which revealed a large infected branchial cyst of type III/IV. This was treated with a combination of endoscopic electrosurgical coagulation and percutaneous drainage, with good success. Discussion and Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the only example in the literature of a minimally invasive approach having been used effectively to treat a branchial sinus and cyst extending to the thoracic inlet. The patient was followed for 1 year and there was no sign of recurrence. No competing financial interests exist and there are no conflicts of interest to disclose. All authors have approved the article and agree with its submission to Videoscopy of the Journal of Laparendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques. Runtime of video: 4 mins 12 secs This work was presented as part of the IPEG 27th Annual Congress for Endosurgery in Children 2018, Seattle, WA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.526
Threshold uncertainty score0.602

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVideoscopySame topicHead and Neck AnomaliesFrench-language works237,207