As visões de povo no jornal Notícias Populares e no conceito de populismo * The conception of people in Notícias Populares newspaper and in the concept of populism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O artigo compara as visões de povo que pautaram tanto o jornal Notícias Populares, no momento da sua criação, em 1963, pelo empresário e líder udenista Herbert Levy, representante da elite liberal paulista, quanto o conceito de populismo na versão elaborada pela sociologia paulista na década de 1960. Minha hipótese é a de que apesar de situados em diferentes posições do espectro político e com motivações e intenções diversas, as visões de povo, tanto da elite liberal paulista representada por Notícias Populares quanto dos formuladores do conceito de populismo, carregam aspectos em comum, inclusive na ambiguidade com que as classes populares são tratadas: ora passivas e manipuladas; ora reconhecidas como cidadãs, aptas a reivindicar seus direitos.*This paper compares the concepts of people that appeared both on the newspaper Notícias Populares at the time of its foundation, in 1963, by the entrepreneur and UDN political leader Herbert Levy, a representative from the liberal elite from the state of São Paulo, and the concept of populism elaborated by the paulista sociology in the 1960s. My hypothesis is that, although located at opposite sides of the political spectrum and with distinct intentions and motivations, the conceptions about popular classes from these two distinct poles share several aspects, including the ambiguity with which these classes are treated: either as passive and manipulated or recognized as citizens able to claim their rights.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".