MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2903323875 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.180921

Inflammation and Heart Rate–corrected QT Interval: Evidence for a Potentially Reversible Cause of Sudden Death in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis?

2018· letter· en· W2903323875 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ahmed Adlan

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2018
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineQT intervalRepolarizationCardiologyInternal medicineSudden cardiac deathSudden deathVentricular fibrillationProlongationElectrocardiographyRheumatoid arthritis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with an increased cardiovascular (CV) mortality risk; however, evidence to date suggests that the presence of traditional CV risk factors, prevalent in patients with RA, only partially accounts for the increased cardiac mortality risk1. In an effort to reduce the CV morbidity and mortality associated with RA, numerous novel risk factors have been sought and implicated, including myocardial repolarization abnormalities2, autonomic dysfunction3, and inflammation4. Given that RA is associated with a doubled risk of sudden cardiac death1, an arrhythmic mechanism would seem plausible. The QT interval marks the time from onset of ventricular depolarization to the completion of repolarization and can be measured using a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) from the beginning of the Q wave to the end of the T wave. Prolongation of ventricular repolarization duration increases the risk of torsade de pointes, which can lead to ventricular fibrillation and sudden death. Prolongation of heart rate-corrected QT interval (QTc) independently predicts sudden death in the general population5 and … Address correspondence to A.M. Adlan. E-mail: adlan.ahmed{at}gmail.com

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0070.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Rheumatology→Same topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias→French-language works237,207→