One-year Outcome of Shanghai Mild Cognitive Impairment Cohort Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to identify the risk factors associated with the conversion from Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer's Disease (AD) dementia for the early detection of AD. METHODS: The study comprised a prospective cohort study that included 400 MCI subjects with annual follow-ups for 3 years. RESULTS: During the first 12 months' follow-up, 42 subjects converted to Alzheimer's dementia (21 probable AD and 21 possible AD), two subjects converted to other types of dementia and 56 subjects lost follow. The factors associated with a greater risk of conversion from MCI to AD included gender, whole brain volume, and right hippocampal volume (rt. HV), as well as scores on the Revised Chinese version of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale 13 (ADAS-Cog-C), Clock Drawing Test (CDT), Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), and Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (ROCFT). The risk classification of the combined ADAS-Cog-C and Alzheimer Cognitive Composite (ACC) score with the rt. HV and left Entorhinal Cortex Volume (lt. ECV) showed a conversion difference among the groups. CONCLUSION: Early detection of AD and potential selection for clinical trial design should utilize the rt. HV, as well as neuropsychological test scores, including those of the ADAS-Cog-C and ACC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".