MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2903411464 · doi:10.4018/ijeach.2019010108

Cascading Workflow of Healthcare Services

2018· article· en· W2903411464 on OpenAlexaff
Phillip Osial, Arnold Kim, Kalle Kauranen

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Extreme Automation and Connectivity in Healthcare · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Canadian institutionsThunder Bay Regional Health Sciences CentreLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkflowInteroperabilityComputer scienceJSONHealth careScalabilityKnowledge managementData scienceSoftware engineeringProcess managementWorld Wide WebDatabaseBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite rapid advancements in technology, the healthcare industry is known to lag behind when it comes to adopting new changes. Most often, when a new technology such as CPOE or EHR systems presents themselves in the healthcare industry, clinicians are left struggling to keep up with their workloads while learning to adjust a new workflow. Instead of disrupting the clinician's clinical workflow, the authors propose a system for transforming clinical narratives presented in the form of discharge summaries from the i2b2 Natural Language Processing dataset into a standardized order set. The proposed system uses natural language processing techniques based on Scala, which extracts discharge summary information about a patient and is proven to be highly scalable. The goal of this system is to increase interoperability between CPOE systems by performing further transformations on the extracted data. The authors adhere to HL7's FHIR standards and use JSON as the primary medical messaging format, which is used both in the US and international healthcare industry organizations and companies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.634
Threshold uncertainty score0.275

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Extreme Automation and Connectivity in HealthcareSame topicBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesFrench-language works237,207